CWTS Article of the Month!

May 1999

"George McClellan - The Peace Maker?"

by Everet K.Cooper

Extracted from The Civil War Token Journal, Volume 31 Number 4.



        Those non-government privately issued quasi-money metallic and
composition devices that we choose to call tokens are arbitrarily divided into
three different categories by collector's and dealers.  These divisions are
labeled as Sutler Tokens, Store Card Tokens, and Patriotic Civil War Tokens.
The first two divisions are explicitly descriptive and those tokens most often
neatly fit into those two categories.  The last division, Patriotic Civil War
Tokens, in truth would be more descriptive if it were called All Other Civil War
Tokens.  Though, it certainly is not denied that a patriotic intent is apparent in a
great number of those included in this group and the label "patriotic' is appeal-
ing for this genre of tokens.  A quick visual review and arbitrary classification of
each Fuld number patriotic token design shows the following tabulation.
 
 
Imitation of U-S. coin  17.2%
Non-patriotic devices  30.2%
Copper-head & uncertain devices  3.3%
Sub-total non-Patriotic 50.1%
Patriotic Personalities 12.1%
Patriotic words/devices 37.2%
Sub-total Patriotic 49.3%

         Thus, for all intents and purposes about half of each of the token
designs is not of a patriotic nature.  The non-patriotic design may be combined
(muled) with a patriotic design to make it into a patriotic token.  Interestingly,
about 17% of the designs could be, when in circulation, hastily assumed to be
a U.S. coin.  This, obviously, a far cry from a patriotic intent.

         Archival records are not available to reveal the intent of the token
manufacturer when a design for a token was conceived and the token put into
production.  This information must remain a part of the mystique for patriotic
token collector's in allowing their imagination to work in interpreting the his-
torical message or intent in the token.

        Take for example the tokens displaying a single cannon as the focal
point of several token designs.  Some of these include the words PEACE
MAKER or such words may be not included.  These tokens as listed in the Fuld
catalog are as follows:
 
 

Fuld 169 PEACE include pointing left,13 stars, no date, no cannon balls.  Unknown maker.
Fuld 171 THE PEACEMAKER, cannon pointing right, dated 1863, 
cannon balls, flag pole.  Attributed George J. Glaubrecht, New York.
Fuld 168 No words, cannon pointing left, dated 1863, 13 stars, 
cannon balls.  Attributed Waterbury Button Company.
Fuld 170  No words, cannon pointing right, no date, cannon balls, no stars; endosed in wreath.  Unknown maker.

         Four different patriotic tokens linked by a common denominator pr-
marily an intimidating field artillery piece.  These tokens were apparently pro-
duced by at least two different token manufacturers.  Do we assume the sym-
bolism to be that the impressive cannon, suggestive of the industrial and mili-
tary might of the Union, will conquer the enemy and bring about peace?  Would
it be a coincidence or plan that the token design artists of two token manufac-
turers by chance originated similar designs?  Or did one copy the other?  Why
were the words PEACE MAKER dropped from one of the tokens?
 

        The "flip" side of the token must be considered as to revealing a pur-
pose for the token when mated (muled) with a design.  The following combin-
ations are listed in the Fuld catalog.
 
 

168/311  Cannon only/ARMY & NAVY
169/213 PEACE MAKER/STAND BY THE FLAG
171/340 THE PEACEMAKER/Shield & liberty cap
171/428 THE PEACEMAKER/C. L.R.

         The extreme rarity (R -1 0) of the Fuld 21/170 would indicate this to be
a test piece and never achieved any level of production.  Therefore, it will not
be considered in the scope of this analysis.

         Three of the above four are patriotic themes without question.  The
fourth with the initials "C.L.R." is somewhat of a mystery.  One might speculate
that they may be the initials of token manufacturer Louis Roloff on the possibility
of his having a first initial of "C".  If the token manufacturer wanted to advertise his business I would believe that he would more fully identify himself.  I suspect that
most of the world would not identify him or his business by the initials alone.  It is
interesting to note the subjects of other tokens that these mysterious initials (Fuld
428) were used with and that almost all were of a patriotic theme.  They are as shown below.
 
 

125/428 ABM LINCOLN PRESIDENT 1864  R- 9
127/428  Lincoln bust  R -8
171/428 THE PEACEMAKER 1863  R- 1
248/428  O.K.  R- 9
294/428 FREEDOM  R- 9
295/428  FREEDOM  R- 9
340/428  Shield, flags, liberty pole. R -9

         Judging by the rarity numbers, the token design of the mysterious
"C.L. R." initials were produced in very limited quantities.  This includes the
muling of "C.L.R." with THE PEACE MAKER (Fuld 171) cannon to make the token
Fuld 171/428 with rarity ratings of R-7 and R-9.  This was the only token in the
cannon series attributed to a second token manufacturer George J. Glaubrecht
of New York City.  Judging by the high rarity ratings his production was pro-
bably quite limited.

         The gun carriage of the cannon in these tokens appears of eighteenth-
 century vintage but that will be considered to be artistic license for the die
 designer and is not a significant factor.

         Discarding the theory that the "Peace Makee' theme was just random
 support for the war,  what could be the purpose of the token's message or
 design?  Note that on two tokens the 1863 date appear's.  Consider that just off-
 stage that year was a national hero and one whose name and face were
 instantly recognizable and included on several patriotic tokens.  This was Major-
 General George B. McClellan.  He had been removed from field command of
 the Union's most powerful army in November 1862 by President Abraham
 Lincoln.  He then retired to New York City with members of his staff ostensibly
 to prepare his official reports of his prior field campaigns.  McClellan was still an
 immensely popular hero and was being courted by many of the leaders in the
 Democratic party as an 1864 presidential or Ohio gubernatoral candidate.
 However, in early June 1863 he declined nomination as Democratic candidate
 for governor in his home state of Ohio.  In late June 1863 numerous spontan-
 eous recommendations from prominent Northerners were sent to President
 Lincoln for the return to duty of General McClellan.  These recommended his
 leading the military forces in repelling Lee's invasion of Pennsylvania at a time
 when General Hooker was being removed from command of the Union Army
 of the Potomac.  Lincoln placed General Meade in command and McClellan
 continued in New York City writing his reports and corresponding with promi-
 nent Democrats.  In mid-1863 the weariness in the country from the war caused
 a yearning for peace in the North.  Horace Greely wrote to Lincoln that "nine-
 tenths of the whole American people, North and South, are anxious for peace-
 peace on almost any terms." The Democratic party was fractured into war-
 Democrats and peace-Democrats with pressure to include a peace plank in
 their 1864 platform.  Many of the Democrats feared that Clement Vallandig-
 ham of Ohio, apparent leader of the so-called "Copperheads", would be
 selected as their 1864 presidential candidate.  McClellan remained noncom-
 mitted as an alternate candidate.  Privately he made it known that he could not
 accept a platform that promised a negotiated peace that did not bring the
 seceded states back into the Union.  To do otherwise, McClellan believed,
 would not be faithful to the soldiers killed or wounded- If McClellan was to be
 the candidate the image of peace through military success had to be the per-
 ception by the voters, particularly those in the military.  Thus, the "soft sell" of
 peace maker but the visual cannon expressing the image of military prowess.
 This had to be among the opening shots for presidential candidate George
 Brinton McClellan.  Perhaps, not of his own designing.

          Most of this is conjecture based on our limited knowledge of the
 tokens involved woven into certain historical facts of the period involved.  As
 the Civil War veteran finished his tale of war experiences to a veteran's group
 he was challenged from the audience about certain facts.  His prompt response
 was that when you have a good story to tell an eye witness always shows up.
 We need "eye witnesses" in the form of writtten records or other theories.
 
 

   Articles reprinted with permission of The Civil War Token Society.
Copyright ©1998-1999